Tuesday, December 7, 2010

Delight in Disorder Poem

Delight in Disorder
By: Robert Herrick
A sweet disorder in the dress
Kindles in clothes a wantonness;
A lawn about the shoulders thrown
Into a fine distraction;
An erring lace, which here and there
Enthralls the crimson stomacher;
A cuff neglectful, and thereby
Ribbons to flow confusedly;
A winning wave, deserving note,
In the tempestuous petticoat;
A careless shoe-string, in whose tie
I see a wild civility;--
Do more bewitch me, than when art
Is too precise in every part.

After I read this poem, I fell instantly in love with it! Though after research I saw it could be interpreted diversely, I chose the more innocent approach. I saw this literally as a man who is in love with a woman who is less than “tidy”—in fact, she mirrors a disaster, constantly in disarray. Overall, Herrick seems to be attacking the universal belief that “organization” is “right.” The fact he condemns the current art portrays the lack of contentment with the “neat and tidy.” This portrays early signs of an art movement, now fully seen in “abstract” art. Written in 1648, it is clear Herrick is way ahead of his times with the whole “Post Modern” movement.  
This entire poem appears to be a paradox. Just looking at the title “Delight in Disorder” would seem contradictory to the people in his day and age. However, as he goes on to explain this idea, he creates more paradoxical comparisons. In the first line, he comments on her dress being a “sweet disorder.” Usually disorder has a connotation of “stress” and means turmoil- something not delightful. When paired with “sweet,” it portrays a completely new contrasting idea. This also sets up for the interpretation that the two lovers have been “fooling around” aka having sex. That would further explain the specific diction within the poem. Rather than being mistaken for a father’s love of his “disordered” child, Herrick purposefully chooses words that place this love in the context of a dating or marriage relationship. Words, such as, “tempestuous” and “bewitch” display the sexual drive the man feels toward this woman, and it is evident his love is not merely in her “lack of order.” Rather than seeing “I like he,” he chooses passionate words, such as, “bewitch” demonstrating how he feels “powerless” and “under a spell”- very common depictions of love, or rather lust.
It’s hard to imagine the man truly “loves” the woman because he only talks of physical attributes. Her clothing: her dress, her shoulders, her ribbons, her shoelaces are all “fine distractions”- but lacks bringing any depth to the poem. He even compares her to art- a very physical item.
                The rhyming scheme within the poem further matches its message. Rather than all rhyming, or all free style, Herrick combines them like he mixes “wild civility.” He takes two extremes and puts them side by side. However, the neat outline of the poem is rather ironic to its content. He chooses simple words that convey strong feelings/ actions. Herrick purposefully makes this an easy read, in order to enable his reader to relate. Perhaps he feels other gentlemen agree with his belief, but cannot put words to it. His details are easily pictured in one’s mind, and therefore evoke emotion and a personal connection. Despite the fact the author’s tone is detached, (which supports the belief that the woman is a prostitute) as a reader, one can take this scene, and add their own passion to it. Since it is not vivid descriptions, rather a “rough outline,” the reader can adapt a more personal aspect to it- perhaps putting a face and therefore passion to the “Delight in Disorder” person.

1 comment:

  1. Wonderful analysis Christina! I'm not surprised you found this poem charming... It's encouraging to anyone who's ever found peanut-butter in remarkably odd places on their clothing... An experience I am unfortunately all too familiar with!

    Interesting connection to the art movement as well.

    I'm glad you picked up on the sexual motif, because it's definitely evident-- how does that change the tone of the piece? You remarked that this indicates a shift from what might be first seen as love to lust. I would agree-- especially when comparing this poem to something like Shakespeare's "My mistress' eyes are nothing like the sun" which ultimately comes across as a deep expression of affection, rather than lust. How would you describe the TONE of this speaker?

    It's great that you're looking into commentaries; reading those will continue to bolster your own understanding of how to effectively develop an analysis. Try not to become reliant on them though-- challenge yourself to take a poem on solo every once in a while. :)

    14/15 (a few editing slips)

    ReplyDelete